Sunday, August 22, 2010

A solution will only help Long Island's environment

The North Shore Sun

Editorial

ATV riders and Long Island's powerful environmental community have long been at odds. For the most part, the environmentalists -- with the backing of the state DEC -- view the sport as dangerous and destructive toward nature.
The ATV operators don't entirely disagree, but feel they're mistreated and misunderstood, and that if Suffolk County established public trails, riders would be better monitored and destructive practices could be reigned in.
From an economic standpoint, a county task force formed five years ago found that public tracks, operated privately, could generate revenue for the county. Such facilities could also help keep ATV enthusiasts from traveling off Long Island -- to other states where there are legal, public trails -- to practice their sport, keeping their money at local businesses.
Public tracks would also keep ATV users off environmentally sensitive areas of Long Island, the task force found.
But there appear to be a few roadblocks in the way of that happening. Chief among those roadblocks, according to Legislator Dan Losquadro, is that there is little support, among environmentalists and in government, for spending conservation money on damaged sites -- such as former sand mines -- to establish public riding spots. That's short-sighted.
We can't deny what Pine Barrens Society head Dick Amper asserts, that "ATVs tear up the terrain, destroy plants, scare animals, introduce pollutants into the air and water and pose a serious safety risk for people peacefully using the woods."
But he can't deny this -- that ATV riders are doing that anyway, every day, and in many cases on the region's most pristine lands, such as in the Pine Barrens and on the beaches and bluffs of Shoreham and Northville.
Mr. Amper says he doubts public trails will cut down on drivers practicing their sports illegally throughout Long Island.
We say it will prove to be money well spent.
Both the ATV riders and our environment need the support of our politicians and residents for the open space purchases of properties on which to build legal tracks.
As of now, police agencies don't have the resources to effectively curb illegal ATV use. ATV operators are running rampant, destroying woods and spreading invasive species, introducing pollutants into water and all that other stuff Mr. Amper speaks of. And they'll keep on doing it, without a plan in place.
Public locations, while not eradicating illegal use altogether, should diminish the number of illegal riders, so that enforcing the law could be more manageable for our police. And as Mr. Losquadro told the editorial board, the more public facilities that are established, the more our local governments should increase fines and punishment for any violators.
"Thirty-plus years of enforcement," Mr. Losquadro said, "and we've had the highest ridership we've ever had on Long Island."
The time to act is now.

1 comment:

  1. Well, you know where I fall on this issue.

    I have an immense respect for Dick Amper and all that he's accomplished. This issue, though, is one where my opinion differs significantly from his - and I do believe that some of what he says can be refuted.

    The issue is not as black and white as many would have you believe. Responsibility for lot of the destructive behavior attributed to ATV riders also falls to enthusiasts of other activities that seem to be on the "okay" list for environmentalists. I see horses and mountain bikes riding all over the Pine Barrens, turning up earth on the trails and no one complains about them. Paintballers, hikers and people simply going for a walk in the woods are responsible for a good deal of litter and vandalism.

    Meanwhile, ATVs continue to outsell street bikes on a nationwide basis, and LI ATV enthusiasts have to cut their riding time down, such that they're making multi-day trips out of state to more ATV-friendly areas in PA, WV, upstate NY and elsewhere, rather than taking an afternoon in their own backyard (figuratively speaking). That's revenue that other state and local governments capture that we turn away.

    To me, this is a huge opportunity for government and business to cooperate, in order to produce a program that yields some public lands on which to ride. I wouldn't mind paying a reasonable membership fee to support local riding and get some public areas to open up to ATV riding.

    Or we could just continue under the present model, where the state takes our registration fees for ATVs and rolls them into the general fund, giving us nothing in return. ATV riders can continue to ride illegally, given that there's presently no other option, aside from going off-Island.

    My vote is for controlled and regulated Long Island riding, with state and local government levying fees on ATV owners in exchange for public riding lands, as opposed to uncontrolled illegal riding everywhere.

    ReplyDelete